Back to home page

 

 

LIGHT SCANNING PHOTOMACROGRAPHY

 In photomacrography, the depth of field is reduced as the reproduction ratio increases and the photographer must resign himself to accept mainly unsharp pictures. Few manufacturers of photographic hardware have grappled with this problem so far. There are however several techniques, ignored even by specialists, to increase this depth of field. The technique developed in this article is called light scanning photomacrography. Simple in its principle, it requires much precision for successful results.

 

EXAMPLE BY PICTURES

 

without light scanning :

To obtain a great depth of field, the aperture is here of f/22, diffraction appreciably deteriorates the definition and the depth of field remains insufficient all the same.

without light scanning :

By increasing aperture to f/5.6, the depth of field decreases. In the depth of field area the sharpness is good and diffraction is less significant.

with light scanning :

By preserving the aperture of f/5.6 and by using the technique of light scanning, one obtains a completely clear photograph with the benefit of an entirely sharp picture.

 

 

A FEW OPTICS THEORIQUE : NUMERICAL APERTURE, RESOLUTION, DEPTH OF FIELD.

 

The numerical aperture u of a lens is the following quantity :

      u = n .sin(a)

    where n = refraction index of the medium in which are propagated the light rays (n = 1 in the air)

    a = maximum angle of the rays resulting from A (point from subject)

Not to confuse numerical aperture and relative aperture, the latter being the focale/diameter ratio and corresponding to the figures engraved on the f/stop ring.

Example for a 55mm focal lens set at f/8 with 82.5mm of the subject (for a reproduction ration G=2) :

u = n.sina = 1x sin(2.39°) = 0.042

 

The resolution (or resolving power) can be calculated according to the following formula :

      Resolution = 0.6 x l / u   (valid for well corrected lenses)

    where l is the wavelength of the light (in practice one can take l = 0.55µm).

    Example for the preceding case :

    Resolution = 0.6 x 0.55 / 0.042 = 8µm
    (2 separate points of 8µm will be solved)

 

The depth of field, in photomacrography, can be calculated in the following way :

      d.o.f. = 2Ne(1+G)/G²

    where G = reproduction ratio

    N = relative aperture

    e = diameter of the permissible circle of confusion (1/30 mm in 24x36)

    Example for the preceding case :

    d.o.f. = 2 x 8 x 0.033 x (1+2) / 2² = 0.4 mm

     

If the iris is stopped down, the depth of field increases but the resolution is degraded. Not always sensitive in general photography, this loss of resolution often becomes critical in photomacrography, especially at high reproduction ratios. The principle of scanning makes it possible to use the lens at its optimal aperture with the benefit of an entirely sharp picture.

 

PRINCIPLE

 

A plane of light thinner than the depth of field is placed in the focus plane. The subject is moved through this plane, parallel to the axis of the camera lens (shutter opened). The parts of the subject successivly enlightened, and sharp, are registered by the photographic emulsion and the unsharp parts, which are not enlightened, will not be in the final picture. The room where one operates must obviously be plunged in the darkness. This technique consequently requires lightsources generating the plane of light and a stage for moving the subject. This process offers an enormous potential since it also enters in the field of photomicrography, allowing very high reproduction ratios (more than 100x).

 

PRACTICAL

 

The following hardware can be used :

The lightsource is a slides projector. In the slide carrier one puts a slide mount in which are assembled 2 razor blades to obtain a fine slit. Note that the condenser of the projector is designed to light an area of approximately 40x40mm and the slit has an area of about 3mm². Only 2 per thousand of the avalaible light is recovered. The lens of the projector may have a focal length from 50 to 80 mm. The width of the slit and the reproduction ratio of projection determine the thickness of the plane of light. It is necessary to stop down strongly the iris of the projection lens or else the light beam will expand too much on both sides of the projection focal plane.

The moving stage is constituted of a staight guide pushed by a screw.

The motion speed controls the exposure which depends on :

  • sensitivity of photographic emulsion
  • luminosity of the plane of light and its thickness
  • reproduction ratio and aperture of the camera lens
  • possible filters

 

Typically, with the hardware used, the speed motion of the subject varies between 1 and 10 mm per minute (for a 100 ISO emulsion). With only one projector the pictures are very contrasted and complex subjects cannot entirely be enlightened. These problems can be eliminated by using several suitably arranged projectors.

 

OPERATING

 

Once that all is well regulated, according to the provision indicated, the projector is switched on and the subject is placed in the plane of light. Then focusing is made (very precisely) : the plane of light and that of focus from now are confused. The subject is then moved just behind the plane, the shutter is opened and the moving stage is started. Once the subject is entirely scanned, the shutter is closed. The enemies, in this technique, are the vibrations and the parasitic movements. All the elements must be connected in a very rigid way. No need to operate on a tripod, this is the assured failure.

 

CONCLUSION

 

This technique, simple in its principle but delicate in its execution, is completely within the range of the patient and meticulous photographer. Realizable with homemade solutions (notice that a Californian company has marketed the idoine hardware since years), it allows to obtain inaccessible pictures in conventional photomacrography.

The disadvantages related to this technique limit its sphere of activity :

  • Allows to operate only in studio
  • Need for killing the insects (thus to restrict on common species)
  • Is not appropriate for translucent subjects (the light is diffused inside)
  • Isometric perspective, not very natural (although in traditional photomacrography the perspective is already very " compressed ")
  • Some parts of the subject can appear in overprinting the ones on the others
  • Allows only lateral lightning, strongly directing

Nevertherless, the applicability remains significant and varied, and the richness of the details shown by the pictures should allow this technique to find new adepts.

 

Back to home page

Return to the top of this document